The Chancellor, Rachel Reeves, has delivered the 2024 Autumn Budget and is set to raise taxes by £40 billion. We summarise the key changes and when these are anticipated to come into force.
This is only a brief summary of the extensive changes that are coming into force. If you have any questions, please get in touch with the Private Wealth & Tax team at Quastels and we would be happy to assist.
Read MorePreparing to sell your leasehold property? Here are five tips to kickstart your sale process.
The importance of finding your perfect match cannot be overestimated. The human factor is at the core of a seamless and transparent process. Good practice is to follow recommendations from friends and family (or your agent), review firm’s/lawyer’s website/profile, and of course compare quotes and establish the law firm’s usual response and transaction times. I would always recommend speaking with your solicitor prior to instructing them: a video call is a good starting point especially if you are based overseas.
If your property is a flat in a high-rise block, the recent legislation called the Building Safety Act 2022 (BSA 2022) will require you to serve a leaseholder deed of certificate (your solicitor will advise you, if required and will assist in preparing the document). The leaseholder deed of certificate is served on your landlord, and the landlord will in turn have four weeks to prepare their landlord’s certificate. The leaseholder deed of certificate will confirm whether your lease qualifies for protections under BSA 2022 (with respect to fire safety remediation works). It is therefore good practice to complete and serve the deed even before you have a buyer.
Your solicitor will provide you with Law Society forms to complete and provide the relevant documentation referred to in the forms. These forms consist of standard questions about your property and must be completed by the seller. If you have questions on the forms, it is advisable to raise these at early stages of the sale process.
Will you require a certain period between exchange and completion? Inform your lawyer at the start of the process. Would you prefer to exchange and complete on the same day? Your lawyer can propose this to the other side. Or are you planning an overseas trip, and your Internet connection may be on and off — do let your lawyer know beforehand, and we can make sure you sign sale paperwork before the trip, or agree digital signing with your buyer, not to delay the process. As always, communication is key, and this works both ways.
Sales and purchases are a stressful process but good preparation and working with a good team can ease the worry.
Nargiz Abdullayeva is a Senior Associate in our Residential Property Team. Nargiz has over 8 years of experience in high-value real estate transactions. To discuss any of the points raised in this article, please contact Nargiz Abdullayeva or fill out the form below.
In the recent case of Nilsson and another v Cynberg [2024] EWHC 2164 (Ch) the High Court have confirmed that a common intention constructive trust (CICT) can vary an express declaration of trust.
These trusts are a method to determine beneficial ownership based on the intentions of the parties regarding the ownership of property even if those intentions were not formally documented.
There are two fundamental elements of a CICT being:
In 2001, Stuart Cynberg and Collette Cynberg purchased a property that they held on trust as beneficial joint tenants and they declared this to be the case in the TR1. Beneficial joint tenants means that both owners hold the equity in the property 100% indivisibly, such that the surviving tenant inherits the other share by survivorship. In 2006, the couple married and subsequently separated in 2009 at which time they discussed finances.
It was agreed by both parties that Mrs Cynberg would own the property solely, provided that she left the property to their children. As a result of the agreement, from 2009 Mrs Cynberg alone paid for all of the property expenses and also used money from her inheritance in 2014 for works on the property.
The couple then divorced in 2018, and shortly after Mr Cynberg was declared bankrupt in October 2018.
Mrs Cynberg sought declaratory relief, stating that she solely owned the beneficial interest in the property. She asserted that the agreement and discussions following their separation had given rise to a CICT or proprietary estoppel which in turn had varied the declaration of trust in the TR1.
The Trustees in Bankruptcy’s defence, however, was that the express declaration of trust was conclusive and could not be overridden by an informal agreement. Therefore, no CICT could have arisen and additionally there was no proprietary estoppel. Mr Cynberg had therefore retained a 50% beneficial interest in the property.
In the first instance, the Judge declared that Mrs Cynberg was the sole beneficial owner.
This was appealed by the Trustees in Bankruptcy on four grounds. However, the following two grounds were of particular significance:
Required consideration of whether a “subsequent agreement” to vary an express declaration of trust must comply with the requirements of S.2 of the Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989 or whether a CICT sufficed.
The Deputy High Court Judge concluded that a subsequent agreement to vary is not limited to one that complies with statutory formalities and may include a CICT.
The second ground was that the extent of detriment suffered by Mrs Cynberg was insufficient to give rise to proprietary estoppel.
The High Court held that taking over the mortgage payments all associated bills and the home improvements was sufficient detriment.
The High Court dismissed all four grounds of appeal and upheld Mrs Cynberg as the sole beneficial owner.
This case is important as it adds to the case law supporting that an express declaration of trust can be varied by subsequent agreements including CICTs.
In practice, these cases turn heavily on the facts particularly that in addition to providing evidence that there was a common intention, it must be demonstrated that an individual has acted to their detriment in reliance of the intention.
Constructive trusts are a complex area and if you are concerned about any such variation we recommend that all agreements/variations are formally documented.
If you have any queries relating to this topic, please contact Ben Rosen or Eleanor Catling at Quastels LLP.
trusted legal excellence
Contact us today to discover how we can support you with legal solutions that stand out from the rest.
Get in Touch