UK tax returns are due by the end of January – but do you know whether you need to report your cryptoassets?
31 January is a key date in the UK tax year, as the deadline for submitting a self-assessment tax return. Hopefully by the time you read this you will be secure in the knowledge that your own return has been submitted, if you are a self-assessment taxpayer. However, if you have been investing in cryptoassets, are you sure that you have reported everything you need to? Unfortunately, given this is such a new type of asset and the law is still being established, many people are unaware of the tax rules relating to their cryptoasset holdings.
For example, have you ever found yourself thinking along the following lines:
If so, you need to carefully consider your tax position – read on for more details.
In the UK, capital gains tax (CGT) is payable on the disposal of any asset. In a straightforward case, this would be when you sell something for cash. For example, if you purchased a Bitcoin in 2010 for £10,000, and you’re selling it now for £80,000, then you would have made a capital gain of £70,000, less any deductible costs.
However, the concept of a disposal goes far beyond a cash sale. For one thing, it includes an exchange of one asset for another, even where one cryptoasset token is swapped for another. Therefore, if instead of selling your Bitcoin for cash you had exchanged it for 30 ETH, you have still made a disposal, and so could be liable for CGT on the difference between the price you paid for the Bitcoin, and the market value of the ETH received in exchange.
More broadly, you will be making a disposal whenever you give up your ownership of a token. For example, if you make a gift to somebody, or spend it, such as to purchase an NFT or to pay for other goods or services. Each of these scenarios can be subject to CGT.
If you are receiving tokens through mining on a proof of work blockchain, or staking on a proof of stake blockchain, then you need to consider whether this is subject to income tax.
The law on this issue is currently not certain, but HMRC’s view is that generally income from mining or staking will be subject to income tax, after deduction of certain allowable expenses. We can provide advice on this topic.
As a remittance basis taxpayer, you do not have to pay UK tax on relevant foreign income, or foreign chargeable gains if such income or gains are not remitted (or brought back) to the UK. However, can a decentralised cryptoasset recorded on a global blockchain be said to be ‘foreign’?
Again, the law has not yet fully clarified this point. However, you need to be aware that HMRC has taken a very wide interpretation of the law, based on the residence of the beneficial owner. HMRC’s position means that remittance basis taxpayers are unlikely to escape UK tax on their cryptoasset income and gains, even where tokens are held for them by a foreign exchange or via a wallet held outside the UK.
If you find yourself in this position, you need to take legal/tax advice, as the position is likely to turn on the precise factual arrangements, as well as the interpretation of the law.
If you find yourself having made cryptoasset disposals, then you need to consider your potential CGT or income tax liability and whether this needs to be reported to HMRC. CGT and income tax are both self-assessment taxes, which means that it is your responsibility to ensure you have reported anything you need to report, whether or not HMRC have already asked you to submit a tax return.
The calculations are not straightforward. For one thing, there will be various deductible costs, to reduce your tax liability. For another, fungible cryptoasset tokens are subject to the share pooling rules, meaning that it is necessary to work out an average cost based on all of your purchases.
Specialist software is available, which can help with these calculations. However, you need to understand the legal interpretation of transactions in order to ensure that the software is analysing your tax liability correctly.
Ben Rosen, Partner, and Jack Burroughs, Senior Associate, in the Private Wealth and Tax team are leading experts on the legal and tax treatment of cryptoassets. We can therefore advise you on the issues that might arise in calculating your taxes, including:
We can provide the analysis of your cryptoasset gains and income needed to submit your tax return, and state your legal position to HMRC where the law is unclear or where mistakes may have been made. We are also able to assist with your estate planning for cryptoassets, helping to ensure that your tokens can pass to those you want to receive them, as tax-efficiently as possible.
To discuss your circumstances and find out how we can help you, please get in touch.
Read MoreTo avoid disappointment at the outset and be totally up front, I’m not here to announce some digital asset rebooted version of Extreme Makeover: Home Edition, although the mere thought of that show does bring a flood of youthful nostalgia my way.
I do, however, find bricks and mortar terminology useful when discussing estate planning with clients. First, you have to prepare the site, then lay the foundation, build the structure (comprising several levels perhaps), and eventually construct the roof to enclose and protect the entire structure. Sometimes, in estate planning, we build ab initio. In other cases, it’s an extension or perhaps just a much needed facelift or renovation.
So why do I mention digital assets? This is not simply a consideration for crypto enthusiasts and proponents of all things decentralisation. Digital is going mainstream, not simply by reference to the current value of BTC or ETH but also by the more widespread adoption of blockchain technology through areas like tokenisation and the use of NFTs to determine the provenance and authenticity of goods.
Digital may even mean simply the passwords to access your moderately successful side hustle business on eBay or Amazon.
So, as we move into an era of increased digitisation both in terms of how we store personal information and, of course, store value, enquiries from clients are building on how to approach digital assets from a trust and succession planning perspective. So, let’s see how the good old world of law is adapting and navigating in this space.
Enter the foundational piece of estate planning – the Will. A Will is not simply for old people as, sadly, it is not just the elderly who are vulnerable to kicking their mortal coil. Some might ask what a document, which derives its essential legal framework from the year 1837, has to say on digital assets. However, this is not about making bequests of the ancient family heirlooms or even preventing an intestacy scenario, but about ensuring that your cryptoassets do not end up in the digital abyss.
Without access to the access key, where is the value? Fundamentally, without a key to the safe, its contents are rendered worthless.
Now, let’s talk about lifetime trusts. The word gets thrown around, but what exactly is a trust?
In short, a trust is a legal arrangement where one person or entity (the trustee) holds and manages assets for the benefit of another person or persons (the beneficiary), in accordance with certain rules or terms.
With a trust, as with a Will (albeit in a more existential sense with a Will), you have to accept a degree of control being lost. Setting up a trust for your cryptoassets means appointing a trustee, a guardian or custodian for your digital fortune. The trustee will navigate the crypto maze, ensuring your assets are in safe hands, and held for the benefit of your loved ones.
This trust might be established with tax, asset protection and succession planning in mind, or perhaps even a combination of all these factors.
Legal structures and documents do not serve merely as the framework for rules. If done correctly with the advisor understanding the asset class, the legal work also serves as an effective communication tool. Whether it’s a traditional family business or the family home, communication is arguably as important as the legal framework itself. What good is the structure without the roof on top? So remember, communication is the key to a smooth transition and this is no less applicable to digital assets.
Create a digital treasure map, an inventory of your cryptoassets, passwords, and access codes. Share this map with your chosen executor or trustee. It’s like passing on the key to the crypto kingdom, ensuring your heirs do not end up in a digital maze brought about less by your doing and more by your inaction.
Let that oft-quoted crypto term be true, WAGMI. We’re All Gonna Make It, indeed, but what is your legacy plan and is it time for a digital makeover…estate planning edition?
For tax and private client advice and services, please contact Ben Rosen via our contact form below.
The legal grey zones in cryptocurrencies have been an underlying concern for investors and the public. The struggle to regulate cryptocurrencies exposes crypto owners to risk of theft by cybercriminals, with a record of approximately $3 billion worth of cryptocurrency being stolen in 2022.
With over 2 million people in the UK who are possessing and using cryptocurrency, the UK legal system is trying to catch up. Crypto theft victims can now seek to recover their lost assets through the legal proceedings via the civil courts.In this article, we will discuss the recent two High Court cases demonstrating the ability of the Courts in England and Wales to flexibly apply the law to issues arising out of crypto asset transactions.
In Jones v Persons Unknown [2022] EWHC 2543 (Comm), the Claimant had been fraudulently convinced to transfer 89.61616088 in Bitcoins to a fake crypto-investment platform. His Bitcoins were traced to a wallet associated with the company Huobi, a Seychelles-based cryptocurrency exchange. A worldwide freezing injunction was obtained against the persons unknown and a proprietary injunction against Huobi.
Due to the complexity of the Defendants in this case, it is helpful to set out who they are individually:
The Court was asked to decide on the following:
The High Court ruled that the Claimant was entitled to judgement against the fraudsters for deceit and unjust enrichment. Therefore, he was eligible to have the Bitcoin, or its value equivalent, returned. In addition, Huobi was declared a constructive trustee in respect of the fraudulently transferred Bitcoin and so the Claimant was entitled to an order for the delivery-up of his Bitcoin by Huobi.
In LMN v Bitflyer Holdings Inc [2022] EWHC 2954 (Comm), the hackers transferred millions of dollars’ worth of cryptocurrency from the Claimant’s computer systems in 2020. An expert traced the cryptocurrency transfer through 26 recipient exchange addresses and discovered that these exchanges were all operated by one of the Defendants or companies belonging to the same group. Furthermore, the exchanges were located in several foreign jurisdictions.
In order to further trace the misappropriated cryptocurrency, the Claimant required ‘Know Your Client’ and other anti-money laundering information from the various exchanges and third parties.
The Court granted the information orders sought by the Claimant, relying on two strands of case law authority, namely;
The latter’s jurisdiction arises when there is robust evidence that the Claimant’s property has been misappropriated. Norwich Pharmacal “allowed a claimant to seek disclosure from an “involved” third party who had information enabling the claimant to identify a wrongdoer so as to be in a position to bring an action against the wrongdoer where otherwise he would not be able to do so” [para 18].
In addition, Bitflyer Holdings is one of the first decisions in which the Court has granted permission to serve proceedings outside the jurisdiction under the new Gateway for Information Orders (GIO). These orders were introduced in October 2022 to facilitate the making of Norwich Pharmacal and Bankers Trust applications against Defendants overseas. GIO apply where there is an application for disclosure in order to obtain information regarding the true identity of a potential Defendant and/or what has become of the Claimant’s property, with a view to issuing proceedings that are intended to be commenced in England and Wales.
Both these decisions are incredibly important in the Wild West environment of cryptocurrency. One of the advantages of trading in cryptocurrency is the elevated level of anonymity it provides. The other side of this is that fraudsters, money launderers, and other shady characters are drawn to cryptocurrency like moths to a flame. These decisions highlight that English Courts are not only willing to treat cryptocurrency as a form of property and to make orders aimed at assisting the recovery of stolen cryptocurrency, but they are also alive to the fact that the law must move quickly to protect Claimants’ rights, especially when Parliament may be slower to legislate. Ultimately, these decisions confirm both that England and Wales is a favourable jurisdiction for those conducting business that involves crypto assets and that, should fraud take place, there are strategies available to seek a recovery.
Quastels LLP has the expertise to protect and recover your digital assets. For legal advice on protecting your digital assets, please call +44 (0)20 7908 2525.
trusted legal excellence
Contact us today to discover how we can support you with legal solutions that stand out from the rest.
Get in Touch