Latest Posts
The Biggest Reputation Management Lesson From Katespiracy
The recent controversy surrounding the Princess of Wales, Kate Middleton’s, photograph demonstrates the critical importance of careful and timely reputation protection and the consequences of mismanagement.
The royal family’s reputation arguably serves as the cornerstone of its significance. As prominent public figures, they ought to represent a non-politicised beacon of trust, honour, and exemplary conduct for society. They represent both the UK and the Commonwealth and much of their popularity is because of meticulous management of their public image.
Throughout history, there have been instances where allegations of impropriety have arisen, striking at the very essence of the royal family and, by extension, our collective values. Consequently, they are subject to intense scrutiny.
When things go wrong, it becomes imperative to navigate and manage the reputation of one of the world’s most renowned families, akin to other high-profile individuals and businesses.
The recent events not only reignite the debate over whether the royal family is entitled to privacy (regardless of their status and prominence) but also illustrate that without a well-thought-out strategy, the opposite of what you are seeking to achieve could be the result.
What Happened?
Kate’s extended absenteeism from her public duties gave rise to mounting speculation over her health. In seeking to dispel the rumour mill a decision was made to release a photo of Kate, with her three children.
The image, was claimed to have been taken by Prince William himself, it was released by Kensington Palace on Mother’s Day in the UK. The portrayal of a relaxed and happy family moment.
However, within hours, eagle-eyed observers noticed irregularities suggesting it had been doctored. The Associated Press and international news agencies swiftly issued a rare “Kill notice”, urging the removal of the manipulated image from circulation.
The misstep was compounded when the concerns were not addressed promptly. Instead of quickly acknowledging and rectifying the situation, silence ensued, exacerbating the damage and increasing speculation.
By the time an apology was issued interestingly:
- from Kate personally, despite the photo being taken by Prince William and distributed by Kensington Palace;
- and with the original image remaining hidden) the damage was done. Instead of suppressing doubts about Kate, they were intensified.
Instead of being authentic to encourage and build trust, it was eroded.
Effective Reputation Management Often Requires:
- Establishing Clear Values: Here, the core values and principles that the royal family represents, ensuring consistency in messaging and behaviour.
- Proactive Media Engagement: Regularly engagement with the media through interviews, press releases, and social media platforms to shape the narrative and maintain transparency.
- Crisis Preparedness: Developing a comprehensive crisis management plan that outlines protocols for addressing negative incidents swiftly and effectively.
- Review of Requests/Enquiries: Considering the matter, often starting with the background and any events/allegations, and how different responses might be received.
- Communication: Communicating authentically, sometimes acknowledging mistakes when they occur and outlining steps taken to rectify them.
- Long-term Vision: Maintaining a long-term perspective and to prioritise actions that align with your overarching goals and objectives.
- Continuous Monitoring: Monitoring media coverage (and public sentiment) to identify potential reputational risks and seek to address them before they escalate.
- Adaptability: Staying flexible and adaptable to respond to changing circumstances, including where perceptions have evolved.
In addition, other aspects may also need to be considered, for example community engagement (to demonstrate commitment to public service and foster positive relationships with the public) and strategic partnerships (collaboration with reputable organisations and influencers to amplify positive messaging and enhance credibility).
A Right To Privacy?
Even though the royal family’s privacy rights are often questioned, regardless of their status and visibility, British courts have upheld privacy rights for everyone, including royals. They carefully weigh Article 8 of the Human Rights Act, which protects the right to privacy, against Article 10, which upholds freedom of expression.
The courts have recognised that being in the public eye doesn’t automatically waive one’s right to privacy. However, there are instances where this boundary can be crossed, as seen when images of model Naomi Campbell leaving a Narcotics Anonymous meeting were determined by the court to be in the public interest, given her prior denial of substance abuse issues.
Takeaway
Any media response is often a delicate balance between confidentiality and transparency. It includes considerations of the law protecting rights such as confidentiality and privacy as well as what, when and how information might be shared. Whether using proactive or reactive strategies the aim is to consider the interface of conflicting rights and objectives and then control the narrative whilst minimising the amplification of negative perceptions. It is for this reason that the best results are often achieved by collaboration between lawyers and PR agencies.
As with litigation, understanding the law combined with meticulous planning, messaging, and ongoing monitoring can be crucial to successfully navigating such situations. Unfortunately, following this incident, Kensington Palace may now have to face the aftermath of how even slight alterations to pixels can significantly impact perception.
To discuss any of the points raised in this article, please contact Robert Kay or fill in the form below.
UK Immigration Perspective on the New UK Tax Regime
Following the recent Budget announcement, the proposed and radical changes to the tax regime have sparked discourse among professionals within the private wealth space. One of the key impacts is the abolition of the non-dom tax regime, a key attraction for wealthy clients considering residency in the UK. The impact of this change could potentially shake the UK’s competitiveness as a destination for talent and wealth.
Effective from the 6 April 2025, the new tax regime will apply to new arrivals who have lived outside of the UK for a consecutive 10 tax year period. These individuals will benefit from tax relief for a four-year period, allowing them to bring wealth to the UK without incurring additional tax charges. The new regime will also apply to existing UK resident non-doms who have been in the country for four years or less.
Residency Challenges
Whilst the four-year relief period may appear manageable, it poses challenges in alignment with immigration residency requirements. For individuals intending on securing British Citizenship, a continuous UK residence of five years is typically required for settlement, followed by an additional year for citizenship eligibility. This dealignment raises concerns about the practical capability for individuals seeking citizenship under the new regime.
As the UK anticipates elections later this year, the potential for a change in government adds another layer of uncertainty. The implications of a shift in leadership on the newly proposed tax regime remain to be seen, and it underscores the complexity and challenges of the private wealth space.
Next Steps
Our advice to our clients is to consider taking pre-emptive steps to secure your residency in the UK by April 2025. If you are considering obtaining residency in the UK, our team of lawyers can provide you with a strategy together with our tax colleagues to enable you to secure temporary or permanent residency, this is particularly important if you own property in the UK.
If you or your connections require legal advice, please contact Jayesh Jethwa or fill out our enquiry form below.
Non-Doms – FIGuring Out What To Do Next
On Wednesday, the Chancellor announced a proposed abolition to the UK tax system that applies to UK resident non-domiciled individuals, with the changes set to come into force from 6 April 2025.
The Key Proposals
New Arrivers
From 6 April 2025, the UK will abolish the current remittance basis of taxation for UK resident, non-domiciled individuals. In its place, there will be a new four-year foreign income and gains (FIG) regime which will be implemented for those becoming UK tax resident (to be determined by the Statutory Residence test) following 10 years of non-UK residence.
For those eligible individuals, they will be able to make a claim to not pay UK tax on their FIG in their first four years of UK residence, which will include distributions from offshore trusts.
Surprisingly, these proposals appear to apply to even UK domiciled individuals who have spent 10 tax years outside of the UK. The one downside to electing for this regime is the forfeiting of personal allowances and capital gains tax exemptions.
Existing UK Residence But Not Domiciled Individuals
For individuals transitioning from the remittance basis of taxation to the arising basis in April 2025, a number of rules will apply including:
- a one-time tax reduction of 50% on foreign income (not on gains) will be in place for the 2025/26 tax year;
- a Temporary Repatriation Facility (TRF) levies a 12% tax rate on remittances of pre-6 April 2025 FIG for the tax years 2025/26 and 2026/27;
- allowing certain individuals to rebase assets held personally at 5 April 2019 for capital gains tax purposes; and
- business investment relief will continue to apply to pre-6 April 2025 income.
Trust Taxation
- From 6 April 2025, protection from tax on income and gains arising within settlor-interested trust structures will no longer be available for non-domiciled and deemed domiciled individuals who do not qualify for the new FIG regime.
- FIG arising in trusts from 6 April 2025, will be taxed on the settlor on the same basis as UK domiciled settlors, unless eligible for the new FIG regime.
- Pre-6 April 2025 FIG matched to trust distributions will continue to be taxed on settlors or beneficiaries. Trust beneficiaries and settlors within the four year FIG regime will receive benefits from 6 April 2025, free from UK tax, though these benefits are not matched to trust income and gains and are subject to a modified onwards gift rule.
Inheritance Tax
The inheritance tax system is also planned to shift from domicile-based to residence-based from 6 April 2025, pending consultation covering various issues, including transitional provisions and connecting factors.
However, the proposal suggests that IHT would apply to worldwide assets after 10 years of UK residence. It also seems to suggest that this exposure to IHT can be lost after 10 years of non-UK tax residence.
Of particular note is the proposal that any trusts created by non-doms before 6 April 2025 will have excluded property status for IHT purposes.
Please note that the above does not constitute legal advice.
For private wealth & tax advice and services, please contact Ben Rosen via our contact form below.