Litigation and dispute resolution is complex and, mostly, adversarial. Most view the opposing party as the enemy and, like battle, there is conflict and confrontation, with each side seeking to control and defend their position.
Some lawyers see it as a battle of words and arguments, where the loudest voice prevails, but beneath the surface of the legal proceedings, there lies a quiet yet immensely powerful tool that can turn the tide in favour of those who employ it effectively: active listening.
Of course, legal expertise and persuasive arguments are vital components of success, but active listening cannot be underestimated.
In this article, I’ll discuss the importance of listening to the other side,explore the benefits it can bring, and offer practical tips on how to incorporate this invaluable skill into your strategy.
The Power of Listening
“Nothing I say this day will teach me anything. So if I’m going to learn, I must do it by listening.” Larry King
Effective communication is at the heart of any successful dispute resolution strategy. It operates on two levels. The first is understanding my client’s perspective and objective.
As I discussed in an earlier post, it is necessary to actively engage with clients to comprehend properly their emotions, concerns, and ultimate goals. This understanding is essential for crafting a compelling legal strategy that aligns with their objectives.
The second level, which is often overlooked by some lawyers, who may focus too much on presenting their own arguments, is to lend an ear to the opposing party and (if the opportunity presents, for example at a mediation) their clients. Listening to what they have to say can be a game-changer in resolving cases more efficiently.
“When you talk, you are only repeating what you already know. But if you listen, you may learn something new” – Dalai Lama
Listening allows you to gain a deeper understanding of the other side’s perspective, motivations, and concerns. By actively listening you can uncover valuable insights that may not be readily apparent from the documents or formal communications. Failing to actively listen may result in missed opportunities or overlooking facts that could be detrimental.
This can provide critical information which can help identify and adapt legal strategies as needed.
Showing a willingness to listen, can create an environment that encourages open and constructive communication. By establishing a channel for dialogue, this can lead to more productive negotiations.
Even if a settlement is elusive, understanding the emotions, concerns, and motivations of clients and opposing parties may help the development of a more nuanced strategy to enable the presentation of the case in a more persuasive and compelling manner.
Through active listening, you may discover common ground or shared interests between the parties. This commonality may pave the way for a more amicable resolution. It can provide opportunities to explore the common ground, potential areas of compromise and mutually beneficial solutions that might meet both parties’ needs. It’s often easier to build on common ground than to push opposing agendas.
Practical Tips for Effective Listening
Now that we understand the importance of listening, here are some practical tips on how to incorporate this skill into your litigation strategy:
“The word listen contains the same letters as the word silent” – Alfred Brendel
Approach each conversation with an open mind, free from preconceived notions or judgments. This will allow you to absorb information without bias.
Reflect what has been said, to check you understand correctly, and encourage the other side to share their perspective by asking open-ended questions. These questions require more than a simple “yes” or “no” answer and can lead to a more in-depth discussion.
Maintain Professionalism: While listening, remain professional and respectful: the goal is to foster constructive dialogue, not engage in attacks.
Listening is a deceptively simple skill that is often overlooked in its power. In litigation, where legal battles are fought with words and evidence, active listening is not just a soft skill; it is a strategic advantage.
Lawyers who prioritise active listening are better prepared to understand their clients, communicate effectively, gather crucial information, build empathy, and ultimately achieve successful outcomes.
To discuss any of the points raised in this article, please contact Robert Kay or fill in the form below.
At its most basic, the only document required for the sale and purchase of shares in a company is a share transfer form executed by the seller to the buyer. But we would always advise a buyer of shares to enter into a binding Share Purchase Agreement (or ‘SPA’) with the seller, which document should contain detailed warranties from the seller.
When buying the shares in a company, you will be acquiring the company ‘warts and all’ – all the good aspects (i.e. the company’s assets, staff, contracts, etc.) but also the less good aspects (i.e. the company’s debts, tax liabilities, outstanding contractual obligations, any pending litigation, etc.). To protect the buyer, the SPA should contain detailed warranties from the seller about the company so that the buyer is made fully aware of both the good and the bad.
Because warranties are statements of fact given by the seller about the company being sold which the buyer relies on when deciding whether to buy the company, if a warranty is later found to be untrue, the buyer may be entitled to make a claim by the buyer against the seller for any losses it may suffer as a result.
Generally, warranties can be provided in a standard format, but they sometimes need to be tailored to specific circumstances of the company and the transaction. But where the facts do not fit the ‘standard’ warranties, the seller will want to ‘disclose’ relevant facts which are contrary to the warranties given. Such disclosure is usually contained in a separate disclosure letter – which sets out clearly what facts have been disclosed (and therefore which facts the buyer is deemed to be aware of when entering into the SPA).
By way of example, if a warranty states that there are no anticipated liabilities other than those set out in the company’s balance sheet, but the seller is aware of a proposed litigation claim, details of the proposed claim should be separately ‘disclosed’ to be sure that the buyer cannot later say they were not made aware of that potential liability.
Disclosure by way of the disclosure letter can be of benefit to both the seller and the buyer: (i) it can provide a defence to the seller – if the seller might otherwise be in a breach of warranty (i.e. the seller’s warranty proves to be untrue), provided that the seller made a legally adequate disclosure against that warranty, the buyer cannot bring a claim against the seller in relation to that claim; (ii) it can also bring to light to the buyer certain information that it might not have obtained in the due diligence process.
The disclosure letter is often accompanied by a bundle of supporting documents which again serve to benefit both parties – the supporting documents make clear which documents the buyer has been made aware of, and the buyer may discover information that it did not obtain in the due diligence process.
It is important for any information that qualifies the seller’s warranties be incorporated in and properly disclosed in the disclosure letter. The seller should not assume that the buyer already knows something or that if the information was contained somewhere within documents previously supplied as part of the due diligence process (e.g. ‘buried’ in a data room) that this will provide protection for the seller in respect of a claim for an untrue warranty. The best starting point to provide the seller protection or a defence is to include the relevant information or disclosure within the disclosure letter.
Some sellers leave the disclosure letter to the last minute just prior to exchange of the SPA, but the preparation of disclosures specific to the transaction requires a detailed analysis by the seller of each warranty contained in the SPA based on their knowledge of the business.
They need to carefully consider whether any facts or matters may exist that make any of the statements untrue. This needs to be addressed by the seller and its senior team members and its finance team or accountants, etc. The warranties need to be reviewed by all relevant senior personnel and this process should not rely upon the legal advisers to know whether a warranty is or is not untrue without qualification (i.e. whether disclosure is required against a warranty).
Where a thorough due diligence process has been undertaken, the buyer should not find any major surprises when they review the draft disclosure letter, but if any items do arise from the draft disclosure letter they can then be dealt with in the SPA before it is signed.
Although the disclosure process (when done properly) can be time-consuming, it is a valuable step in the company sale process which provides great protection, especially for the seller but also provides benefits the buyer. Parties may be tempted not to give the disclosure process the priority it deserves in a company sale transaction, given other issues that seem to be more urgent or important.
However, mistakes during disclosure can be extremely costly, especially where a claim that could have been easily avoided is brought by the buyer after completion which would have been completely avoided had the appropriate disclosure been made.
To discuss any of the points raised in this article, please contact Jason Greenberg or fill in the form below.
Having been popular in the US for decades, search funds and entrepreneurial acquisitions are a steadily growing concept in the UK and Europe. One of the reasons for their growth is that millions of business owners are reaching retirement age with no successor.
In contrast to traditional entrepreneurship, where the entrepreneur comes up with an idea and then grows it into a company, the idea of entrepreneurship through acquisition is embedded in the acquired company. In this introduction to search funds and entrepreneurial acquisitions, I explain the process and set out the pros and cons.
Search funds are investment vehicles through which aspiring entrepreneurs, known as “searchers,” raise capital from investors with the primary objective of identifying, acquiring, and managing an existing business.
Searchers are typically (but not always) young and ambitious professionals with limited entrepreneurial experience. They leverage the expertise of the investors. Investors provide the necessary capital, mentorship, and industry knowledge to aid in the search, acquisition, and successful operation of a business. In return, they receive a significant equity stake in the acquired company.
Entrepreneurial acquisitions typically follow the below process:
Search funds allow aspiring entrepreneurs to enter the business world with a reduced level of personal financial risk. They can leverage the expertise and financial support of their investors to acquire an established business rather than starting from scratch.
In addition, the process of identifying, acquiring, and managing a business provides searchers with valuable hands-on experience in entrepreneurship. They gain insights into various aspects of business operations, from financial management to leadership.
Search funds also provide access to capital from experienced investors who often have a network of industry connections. This financial support, coupled with mentorship and guidance, increases the chances of a successful acquisition and business growth.
Finally, entrepreneurial acquisitions can breathe new life into existing businesses, preserving jobs, and maintaining continuity in the marketplace. This can be particularly significant in industries where succession planning is a challenge. For investors, search funds offer a unique opportunity to diversify their portfolios. Instead of traditional investments, they can back promising entrepreneurs and participate in the growth of the acquired businesses.
Identifying a suitable acquisition target can be a challenging and time-consuming process. It requires in-depth research, market analysis, and a clear understanding of the searcher’s own strengths and weaknesses. In addition, raising capital for search funds can be a hurdle, especially for first-time searchers. Convincing investors to commit significant funds based on a business plan requires strong presentation and negotiation skills.
Inaccurate or incomplete due diligence can lead to costly mistakes. If searchers fail to uncover critical issues during the due diligence phase, both they and their investors can face significant monetary loss. Therefore, relying on the expertise of legal, financial, and other professional advisors (for example valuers) is paramount to mitigating the risks of acquiring a target company.
Search funds and entrepreneurial acquisitions have emerged as a viable pathway for aspiring entrepreneurs to enter the business world, leveraging the expertise and financial support of investors to acquire and revitalise existing businesses. It also provides owners of the target companies with a feasible succession plan.
Whether you are an investor, target business owner, or entrepreneur, we can assist you with all associated legal matters concerning search funds and entrepreneurial acquisitions.
To discuss any of the points raised in this article, please contact Adam Convisser or fill in the form below.
trusted legal excellence
Contact us today to discover how we can support you with legal solutions that stand out from the rest.
Get in Touch