The Renters’ Rights Bill (“Bill”) was introduced to Parliament yesterday. According to the Labour Government’s manifesto, the Bill is designed to transform the experience of private renting and includes, as anticipated, the removal of Section 21 ‘no fault’ evictions.
This Bill represents Labour’s answer to the Conservative’s Renters (Reform) Bill, which failed to pass through Parliament before the recent general election. However, certain elements have been retained, such as the Decent Homes Standard and the right for a tenant to request permission for a pet in a rental property.
If the Bill becomes law, then the proposed changes to the private rental sector will have a significant impact on both landlords and tenants.
All fixed-term assured tenancies will become periodic, providing tenants with greater security and enabling them to challenge poor practice and unfair rent increases without fear of retaliatory eviction.
Effective as soon as the Bill becomes law and will apply to all private tenancies. Section 21 ‘no fault’ notices served before the Bill becomes law will continue to be valid until they expire.
Further protective measures for tenants (for example, increasing the mandatory threshold for eviction from 2 to 3 months’ arrears and the notice period from 2 to 4 weeks). Strengthened rights for landlords to reclaim properties when necessary (e.g. to move back in or sell). Tenants will benefit from a 12-month protected period at the commencement of a tenancy, during which landlords will be unable to evict them to move in or sell the property. Landlords seeking to rely on this ground will need to provide 4 months’ notice.
The Bill will allow tenants to appeal above-market rents. Landlords remain entitled to increase rents to the market price and an independent Tribunal will determine this, if necessary.
All private landlords in England with assured or regulated tenancies will be obliged to join. Tenants will be able to use this service to complaint about landlords’ conduct and action. The service will provide binding resolutions and may also compel landlords to take certain steps (e.g. remedial action, payment of compensation).
All landlords of assured and regulated tenancies will be obligated to register themselves and their properties on the database. Landlords could be subject to penalties if properties are let without having been registered. Further, the database will allow landlords to access relevant guidance, helping them to understand their obligations and demonstrate compliance.
Tenants will have strengthened rights to request a pet in the property. Landlords will have to carefully consider the request and will be prevented from unreasonably refusing consent. Landlords will be able to require adequate pet insurance in place to cover the risk of damage.
The Bill will allow for regulations to be made setting out Decent Homes Standard requirements for private rented sector homes alongside providing local authorities with appropriate enforcement powers.
Extended to the private rental sector, which will allow tenants to challenge dangerous conditions. Landlords will have to take swift remedial action, failing which tenants will be able to commence enforcement action through the courts.
Landlords will retain the right to choose a tenant on the basis of affordability, but not on the basis a prospective tenant is in receipt of benefits or has children.
Landlords and agents will have to advertise the rent being sought and will be prevented from asking for, encouraging or accepting rent above the published price.
Expansion of civil penalties, wider investigative powers and a requirement to report on enforcement activity.
Rent repayment orders will be extended to superior landlords. Further, the maximum penalty will be increased to 2 years’ rent and repeat offenders will be required to repay the maximum amount of rent.
The Bill introduces a raft of measures that are designed to transform the private rental sector. If passed in its current form, the impact on both landlords and tenants will be significant. Whilst tenants will immediately benefit from greater security, it will have far-reaching implications for landlords. We will closely follow its progress through Parliament and shall provide further updates on the proposed legislation in due course.
To discuss any of the points raised in this article, or if you require advice on any property-related issues, then please contact Daniel Blake (dblake@quastels.com), a Property Litigation Partner in our Dispute Resolution team, or fill out the form below.
If you hold a long lease or are a landlord holding property subject to long leases, this affects you.
Following last week’s surprise announcement of a general election, the Government has rushed through the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 (the “Act”) which will grant homeowners further rights and powers over their homes.
Jeff Smith, Labour MP for Manchester Withington, said:
“It is not perfect, [but] It is a step forward, so we are pleased to support this legislation going on to the statute books this evening”
The bill has received Royal Assent and become law.
We do not yet know from when these changes will have effect and many questions remain open. For example, (i) the impact of the Act on contracts which have been exchanged and whether parts of those contracts will be void; (ii) the impact on current pending applications for lease extensions – if for instance withdrawn; and (iii) calculations of the value for a lease extension.
In summary, the Act aims to provide leaseholders with further rights, powers and protections over their homes to try and make ownership and management of leasehold properties fairer and more transparent.
We would not be surprised if further reforms are likely and we will publish an update after the King’s Speech, which will be delivered during the State Opening of Parliament (expected to take place on 17 July 2024).
To discuss any of the points raised in this article, please contact Daniel Blake or fill in the form below.
In the recent case of Sainsbury’s Supermarkets Limited – v- Medley Assets Limited, Sainsbury’s (the tenant of a commercial unit in Kentish Town, North London) successfully prevented their landlord from carrying out redevelopment plan, securing a new lease under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 (“LTA”).
Sainsbury’s owned the leasehold interest of a whole building on Kentish Town Road, but only occupied the ground floor space. The upper floors were empty, and the landlord wished to convert them into flats, having obtained planning permission from the London Borough of Camden. The landlord served a Section 25 Notice, opposing the grant of a new tenancy on the grounds of redevelopment (known as ground ‘f’ opposition).
The right to renewal of a lease afforded protection by virtue of the LTA is with reference to the ‘holding’ i.e. the part of the property occupied by the tenant for purposes of its business. In order to satisfy opposition on the grounds of redevelopment, a landlord must demonstrate a firm and settled intention to carry out works to the holding and that such works cannot be undertaken without having first obtained vacant possession of the holding.
Critically, the court will only determine what constitutes the holding at the date of the trial of the landlord’s ground of opposition, not when a landlord served its Section 25 Notice. This is possibly why the landlord amended its redevelopment plans (widening a staircase from the ground to the upper parts, lowering the basement floor and refurbishing the upper parts) after service of its Section 25 Notice.
The landlord’s amended plans encroached on a small part of the ground floor that was occupied by Sainsbury’s. On advice, Sainsbury’s vacated this area shortly before trial – ensuring it no longer remained part of the holding – to try and prevent the landlord from successfully arguing it had an intention to carry out works to the holding and therefore frustrate the ground ‘f’ opposition.
The landlord’s counter argument was to rely on section 32(2) of the LTA – requiring a tenant to take a new lease of the entire property as demised by the current lease.
The court ruled in favour of Sainsbury’s and found that (for the purposes of ground ‘f’ opposition) the holding was strictly limited to the part(s) of the property it occupied for the purpose of its business.
In addition, the landlord also failed to oppose Sainsbury’s request for a new lease as the court found it did not possess a ‘firm and settled intention’ to carry out the works – even if Sainsbury’s gave up possession.
Whilst the landlord provided plans and evidence of its proposed works,
This case highlights some of the strategies tenants can deploy where a landlord has sought to rely on ground ‘f’ opposition.
For example, a tenant – if feasible – could, prior to trial, limit its occupation to a part of the holding that is not impacted by the landlord’s proposed works and then move back into the remainder of the property once the landlord had undertaken its work and before the second stage trial (to determine the terms of the renewal lease).
It is important that both landlords and tenants are aware of the novel approach in this case. Further, this case serves as a stark reminder that planning permission, work proposals and funding will not, in themselves, be sufficient to demonstrate the requisite firm and settled intention. A landlord must be able to demonstrate that:
To discuss any of the points raised in this article, please contact Daniel Blake or fill in the form below.
Read Moretrusted legal excellence
Contact us today to discover how we can support you with legal solutions that stand out from the rest.
Get in Touch